|
10/10 A
Beautiful Day In The Neighborhood ?
Won't You Be My Neighbor?...Is it still
a bull market? Has the big bad bear finally arrived? Are
we sitting on support levels ready to bounce off and retrace an
upward path (at least to some extent)? Are we breaking key
long term support lines that portend impending disaster (or, more
correctly, continued disaster)? Day to day, it's simply
anybody's guess. Clearly, "investment professionals"
largely make the world go around each hour of the day and each day
of the week, but overlaid on top of frenetic short term trading
activity in the current environment is a much more important force
of nature - the actions of the public. Step back for a second
and look at the big picture. There is simply no question that
Main Street America has been the driver of the current bull
market over the last 3-4 years. Or, more correctly, they have
provided the vast majority of the fuel. Foreigners have aided
the cause recently, but mom and pop America have voted with their
retirement savings accounts and individual pocketbooks their belief that
equities are the place to be. We're not talking about the
public day traders here, at least those that are still
participating. We're talking about the everyday "Joe and
Jane's" who have entrusted their financial net worth's to the
mutual fund industry.
The belief in stocks as the place to be has
been tested a number of times over the past two to three
years. The Asian/Latin American economic crises. The
LTCM debacle. The dreaded Y2K imaginary e-disease. So
far no blinking. As we have shown you before in the numbers,
despite popular rhetoric, the public never really buys the
dips. They do buy the recoveries. But, the greater
message is that they have never really sold. Never in the last
half decade or more has there been any sustainable net selling in
equity mutual funds. Of course there is the odd week or two,
but absolutely nothing sustainable. The public has sold
sectors of the stock market before (within the mutual fund complex),
but the money has largely been reallocated to other sector
funds. It was only one month ago that we showed you the
following table:
($
in billions)
|
Fund
Type |
1998 |
1999 |
2000
YTD |
|
|
|
|
|
| Aggressive
Growth |
$
11.7 |
$
34.4 |
$
98.7 |
| Growth |
64.3 |
97.0 |
79.3 |
| Sector |
6.8 |
28.9 |
50.8 |
| Emerging
Market |
.99 |
.76 |
1.0 |
| Global |
4.3 |
3.1 |
22.9 |
| International |
.83 |
5.6 |
28.6 |
| Regional
Equity |
2.3 |
1.4 |
(2.3) |
| Growth
& Income |
61.9 |
30.7 |
(30.9) |
| Income
Equity |
4.9 |
(14.5) |
(16.7) |
| |
|
|
|
| TOTAL |
$
157.0 |
$
187.7 |
$231.4 |
See what we mean? From Income Equity and
Growth and Income funds to Aggressive Growth, etc. The money
has recycled, but not left the equity fund complex on a net basis
(except for that money that has unfortunately gone to "mutual
fund heaven", of course).
Public Enemy Number One...The jury is
still out on whether the public will become involved as active
sellers. Collectively involved. Simultaneously
involved. We have always believed that given the Pavlovian,
media reinforced mantra of "be a long term investor", real
public selling would not start until the market was already down
25-30%. Clearly that kind of a drop is not yet in the Dow or
the S&P, but the NASDAQ qualifies for the position.
Moreover, belief in equities in general has revolved around the
collective belief that technology was transforming our economy and
society. We would guess that if this market is to unravel
into one of the greater financial debacles this country has ever
seen, the public must become actively involved in selling their
mutual funds. Your next door neighbors must become your
greatest enemies from a financial standpoint. Professional
investors can, do and will panic, but it would be forced selling by
the public that would be responsible for a sustained and long lived
bear market (we're talking multiple years here). One where
stock price liquidation would seem simply endless.
Apocalypse Now?...Why do we bring all of this up? For
perspective. We've heard a lot of financial doomsday scenario talk lately. A
crash would not surprise us by any means. All of the
ingredients are there. Both macro economy and stock market
specific ingredients. Yet we have to remind ourselves that
instantaneous crash events, along the magnitude of 30-50% market declines over a period of days
or a few weeks, are low probability events from an historical
standpoint. Everyone refers to 1929 as a crash, but the true top to
bottom crash event took years to play out. 1987 comes closer to the definition we
posit. Who knows. Anything can happen. Every time
is different in its own way. We just
caution against literally betting the personal financial ranch on a crash. Puts,
shorts and maybe even some gold in a well diversified dark side portfolio
holding plenty of cash is one thing, but betting your financial net
worth on short term, significantly out of the money index puts is
quite another. Just like betting the farm on a Net stock or
two is insane bull market decision making, putting all of your
chips down on a crash bet can result in "the
horror". The horror...
As readers know, we at ContraryInvestor.com
have been bearish for some time. In fact more bearish than the
a-ver-age bear (Mr. ranger, sir). Remember the key word here
is bearish, not piggish. If the public decides to unload, or
even partially unload their mutual funds, there will be liquidity
trouble as far as the eye can see and it will take time to
reconcile. There will be plenty of opportunity to make money
on the downside. Keep a sharp eye on public
fund flows as a potential key to severity of downside market action
ahead. Just as it was tough to keep emotional control when
Internet stocks were gaping 20% higher by the day, try to maintain
objectivity and focus on the numbers during downside breaks as we
have experienced in September and early October. Our primary focus as investors is on not losing
money as opposed to correctly picking the lotto numbers for the
week. We try to be investors in upside environments.
Likewise we want to be investors when the market turns down, not
gamblers. Dark side investments are something altogether
different than betting on crashes. We're not any less
bearish. Just simply trying to be realistic. We
checked our emotions and egos at the door a long time ago. (We just
hope we can still find the claim ticket at some point.)
The one question we would leave you with in
terms of dark side crash bets is the following. Greenspan,
the political administration, G7 powers, etc. immediately rode to
the rescue during the Asian/Latin American problem.
Greenspan and friends dropped interest rates three times to dull
the effects of a singular hedge fund blow up. Liquidity was
sprayed all over the Street to fight the imaginary dragon of
Y2K. Do you really expect the greater vested Street
interests and governmental powers to simply stand back and let the
US equity market go into a free fall without as much as raising a
finger? We didn't think so. Bearish?
Yes. Financial apocalypse? Probably not
overnight.
Backdraft...In addition to the
tinderbox of potential mutual fund sales by the public, clearly
the accelerant in any significant downturn from here will be
margin debt. At least through August, it seems to be the
only index that hasn't corrected. As you can see, it is
still trading very near an all time high:

As we have talked about over the past two
months, the market stands at a perilous crossroads. The
public stands at a crossroads of confidence. A crossroads of
belief, faith and trust. Both the domestic and global
economies stand at the same juncture in the financial pavement,
being so dependent on the perceptions of "financial
wealth" for their real world health.
Sport Utility Vehicles...As you may
know, the utilities are the best performing S&P sector group
through the nine months ended September. After the pounding
they took in 1999 coupled with some scared money looking for shelter
from the storm this year, is it really a surprise? Add in a
few scare stories on electrical generation shortages, a few
scattered dividends here and there and you have the makings for not
inconsequential positive total rate of return. We thought it
would be instructive to take a little look at the group, for which
we have chosen the Dow Utility index as a proxy. Have a peek
(numbers as of 10/9):
|
Members
Of The DOW Utility Average |
|
STOCK |
% Of
Dow Util. Index |
Market
Cap. ($billion) |
| |
|
|
| American
Electric Power |
5.135
% |
$
11.7 |
| Columbia
Energy |
10.077 |
5.7 |
| Con Ed |
4.554 |
6.8 |
| Dominion
Res. |
7.637 |
12.9 |
| Duke
Energy |
11.618 |
30.3 |
| Edison
Intl. |
2.766 |
6.4 |
| Enron |
11.688 |
61.3 |
| PECO |
7.963 |
9.6 |
| Pac. Gas
& Electric |
3.514 |
9.6 |
| Public
Service Ent. |
5.928 |
9.0 |
| Reliant
Energy |
6.280 |
12.7 |
| Southern
Co. |
4.210 |
19.4 |
| TXU
Corp. |
5.197 |
9.7 |
| Unicom
Corp. |
7.346 |
9.2 |
| William
Cos. |
6.095 |
19.2 |
|
|
| TOTAL |
100
% |
$
233.5 |
| Total
w/o Enron |
|
$
172.2 |
| Total
w/o Enron and Williams Cos. |
|
$
153.0 |
These are some of the largest cap
electrical utility stocks in the domestic market. Despite the
S&P sector leading performance for the year, the utilities have
let very few new investors come along for the ride. Just as
the descent of the techs has let very few out along the way.
It's a matter of capitalization and the ability to move or
reallocate money efficiently.
As you know, despite Enron's
prominence in the gas and foreign utility businesses (EOG,
the trading operation, foreign operations, etc.), the stock trades
with a new era scent given it's announced intended forays into
broadband (plus broadband trading). Williams Cos. has much the
same aroma. Even including Enron and Williams, the total
market cap of the Dow Utility Avg. is $233.5 billion. For
perspective, the trip from $75 to $39 cost Intel investors
$242 billion, a sum greater than the entire market cap of the
Utility average. The following table should make it
perfectly clear as to why it's so hard to allocate money away from
today's current favorites into overlooked and underrepresented
(institutional sector weightings) sectors such as the utilities in
an orderly fashion (numbers as of 10/9):
| Stock/Sector |
Market
Cap ($billions) |
| Dow Utilities |
$
233.5 |
| Dow Utilities w/o Enron |
172.2 |
| Dow Utilities w/o Enron or
Williams |
153.0 |
| |
| GE |
$
580 |
| Cisco |
378 |
| Microsoft |
289 |
| Intel |
263 |
| Oracle |
188 |
| Sun |
172 |
GE, CSCO, MSFT, INTC, ORCL and
SUNW have a collective market cap eight times greater than the
entire Dow Utility Index. And this is today, after a period of
some serious market cap loss in the techs and gain in the
utilities. The imbalances created in the past few years will
not allow anything near the orderly reallocation of capital among
disparate market sectors in the aggregate. We've watched in
amazement this year as investors have run to the utilities as a
group with what appears to be a lack of coordinated thought. Up
until now, there has been little differentiation between utilities
that are capacity constrained and those with excess capacity.
We were stunned that Pac Gas was ascending almost daily at the exact
point when it was being forced to pay exorbitant rates for
summertime shortage wholesale power that was essentially not allowed
to be passed on in retail pricing given its currently regulated rate
structure. When it finally screamed for rate relief to the
California State PUC, investors awoke from the blind allocation fog and dropped
the price 20+% in a matter of days.
We bring this up merely as a
reminder that because carnage is being wrought on particular groups
in the market and institutional money is attempting to reallocate on
almost a panic basis, blind momentum following into groups
alternative to mania favorites can be dangerous without some thought
and preparation. There are never any easy answers. Do
your homework.
Memories...Light the
corners of the chart. Thank you Tim for the following
education in parabolic movement and the immutable forces of
financial gravity:

Maybe we should have skipped
the commentary and just published the picture. Worth one
thousand words? Well, maybe in this case, 3240.54 words.
|