|
December
2007
The
"Other" Credit Market
The
“Other” Credit Market...For
readers of our commentaries over the years, you already know that
credit market analysis and observations have held quite the
prominent place in our discussions for many a moon. In
recent years, we have suggested that if macro financial market
turmoil were to finally rear its ugly head at any point in time,
its origin would most likely be the credit markets. Well
whaddya know, that conceptual ship has finally pulled into
port. For now a key issue in our minds as we look ahead is
just how much influence Fed monetary policy will have on non-bank US financial system
trajectory and fundamentals ahead, this being ground zero for macro
credit market largesse over the last decade-plus and the locus
of current market turmoil. Luckily, we're already in the midst of
being presented an answer to this question. Unfortunately,
and at least as of now, three discount rate cuts and two Fed Funds
rate cuts have done little to nothing in terms of influencing the
literal uninterrupted bleeding in asset backed commercial paper
markets, the blowout of LIBOR spreads, swap spreads, and credit
market spreads of all types. Maybe too simplistically, as we
see it, the basic credit market problem of the moment is not
liquidity, it's solvency and ongoing deterioration of collateral
values underpinning mountains of in place leverage originally
built on faulty forward collateral value growth assumptions. So
will Funds rate cut numero tres most likely to be handed down this
month be the silver bullet to change current credit market
circumstances? Or will yet another rate cut ultimately prove
as truly ineffective as the last two, heightening in investor
perceptions the thought that the Fed is burning through precious
monetary ammunition while completely missing the target?
Either way, we're all going to find out in relatively short order.
Although we
continue to believe that the credit markets are the key to
financial market and real economic outcomes ahead, we want to have
a quick look at the "other" credit market - margin debt - for
potentially important messages that appear to us to be being
overlooked at the moment. It
has been one heck of a long time since we've had a peek at the
history and current complexion of NYSE margin debt outstanding.
We believe it's now very important in our current circumstances to
do so. Wasting zero time, let's get right to it. The
following chart is the history of nominal dollar NYSE margin debt
outstanding going back to 1990. Of course, overlaid on this
data is the like period price history of the S&P 500.
Notice anything?

Of course you do. First,
and very simplistically, directional change in both margin debt
balances and the S&P itself has been highly correlated over time. No massive surprise. Secondly,
and admittedly set against the relative short-term financial
market history of the last eighteen years, noticeable spikes in
margin debt have been associated with meaningful tops in the major
equity averages. The coincidental spike into the final top
in early 2000 is simply classic experience and absolutely obvious
in hindsight. So as we sit here today and look at our most
recent circumstances, are we looking at a spike top replay in both
margin debt balances and equity index price? The spike up
in margin debt balances since last summer corresponds exactly with
the big run in the equity averages summer 2006 to summer 2007.
But much as was the experience in 2000, the current spike up in
margin debt looks unsustainable. So too equity prices?
We're going to find out. Moreover, could it be that we are
witnessing a cyclical peaking in margin debt outstanding right
alongside a potential peak in total credit market acceleration
that has been so important to US economic outcomes for so
long? Maybe not so much the coincidence.
Let's look at this same data
from another angle that indeed heightens our sense of near term
risk awareness. Rather than nominal dollar margin debt
balances, let's look at margin debt growth on a very simple year
over year rate of change basis. Again, we've overlaid the
like period S&P 500 price experience for perspective.
Although we only show data going back a decade in this next chart,
the year over year rate of change in NYSE margin debt outstanding
has exceeded 60% on only five relatively short lived occasions
over the last half century. The first was in late 1972,
in front of an almost 50% decline in the S&P over the
following two years. The next came about in mid 1983.
Although the equity bull market was still early in secular lift
odd mode at that time, following that margin debt rate of change
spike, the S&P was 7% lower one year after the margin debt
number elevated above 60%. Following on, we fast-forward to
January of 1993 to again find the annual margin debt rate of change
number climb above 60%. Although there really was no equity
market downturn to follow, the S&P fourteen months later had
not even advanced 2%. The final two examples over the last
quarter century of the year over year rate of change in margin
debt outstanding exceeding 60% lie in the chart directly below.

The 60% year over year rate of
change demarcation line for NYSE margin debt growth was crossed
literally in December of 1999. Although ahead of the final
price top in the S&P, this nominal dollar margin debt peak coincided with the top in the
monthly Dow at that time literally on the nose. The subsequent rate of
change peak in nominal dollar margin debt occurred in March of
2000. Quite the tell at the time. In 2007, the 60%
rate of change level was breached in June. So too was June
the nominal dollar peak in margin debt for now. Although
certainly anything can happen ahead, the history of margin debt
relative to equity market price movement over the last half-century is
suggesting to us we're at a high risk juncture right here.
This is exactly why we wanted to bring up this subject and give
you a bit of historical perspective right now. In fact,
given equity market character as of late, we're quite sorry we've
overlooked this circumstance until now.
Very quickly, the following
chart chronicles the long-term year over year change in NYSE
margin debt. You can clearly see the five periods of rate of
change spike highs in margin debt, the aftermaths of each we
described above. Of course the aftermath of the current
instance is yet to be written in financial market history books.
Have no worries, you'll know firsthand how it all turns out as
you'll get to live through it.

Maybe more for drill than not,
the following table documents equity index price performance in the
3,6,9 and 12 month periods following NYSE margin debt achieving a
60% year over year rate of change. Will this be helpful in
our current experience? We're just going to have to see, but
history is telling us to be quite mindful of risk.
| History
of NYSE Margin Debt Achieving A 60% Yr/Yr Growth Rate And
Subsequent S&P Price Performance |
| Month
of 60% Y/Y Margin Debt Growth |
S&P
3 Mos. Later |
S&P
6 Mos. Later |
S&P
9 Mos. Later |
S&P
12 Mos. Later |
| |
| 8/72 |
5.0% |
0.5% |
(5.5)% |
(6.1)% |
| 7/83 |
0.6 |
0.5 |
(1.5) |
(7.3) |
| 1/93 |
0.3 |
2.1 |
6.6 |
9.7 |
| 12/99 |
2.0 |
(1.0) |
(2.2) |
(10.1) |
| 6/07 |
1.6 |
? |
? |
? |
Although we
did not mention this above, in late 1992 the NYSE changed the
methodology for calculating margin debt outstanding. What
that caused in the data was a bit of discontinuity. And it's
this discontinuity that resulted in the 1/93 annual rate of change
spike in margin debt. Should we throw out this observation
of the 60% year over year margin debt acceleration based on change
in NYSE methodological calculations? We certainly could make
the case for that, but we left it in this discussion in the spirit
of complete coverage of all of the available data. If indeed
the Jan '93 experience is taken out of the admittedly small data
sample of experience due to the data calculation change, then the
S&P was lower in all nine and twelve month periods following
year over year margin debt acceleration of at least 60%. It's
a message we believe is important.
Incredibly
enough, we don't hear anyone talking about these dynamics in the
"other" credit market, the world of margin debt
character. We'll see what happens ahead, but at the moment
the rhythm of NYSE nominal dollar margin debt relative to equity
market action is raising a few warning flags from multiple
viewpoints, both rate of change in margin debt and the spike in
nominal dollar margin balances over the past year that accompanied
the summer '06 to summer '07 rally. As always, the most
important financial market change can occur at the margin - pun
definitely intended this go around.
My Logic Has Drowned In A
Sea Of Emotion...It's
always tough in a market like this to maintain composure and
emotional stability, but indeed those are two of the most
important personal characteristics of successful investors.
In order to try to maintain our own sense of balance, in periods
like this we believe it's absolutely critical to remember that
risk management is really the first and foremost focal point of
our activities necessarily at all times. We'll leave trying
to pick pro forma short term trading bottoms to those courageously
willing to test their fortunes and their will. Although the
character of margin debt circumstances of the moment is indeed a
warning flag in our eyes, we need to remember that this is but one
indicator of emotion. In
the spirit of continuing to watch our backs while trying to
"see" what lies ahead, a number of technical tools have
also helped us in the past in terms of macro risk management.
For if indeed margin debt circumstances of the here and now is
truly warning of the potential for an important top, then
identifying multiple corroboration points of such becomes the
order of the day as we move ahead. In relatively simple
fashion, we try to look back and develop a sense of technical risk
points that have fit our market environment of recent years and at
least respect those points until they perhaps ultimately show us
they are no longer valid. Given that the financial markets
are ever changing beasts, nothing works forever. Nothing.
So we respect what has worked until it doesn't. At least
since 2003, one such corroboration point, if you will, has really
been "staying alive at 75" that has been a big help in
terms of the macro. And by that we're talking about the 75
week moving average of the S&P 500, as is seen below.
The
SPX crossed the 75 week MA for the first time to the upside in the
current bull sequence during May of 2003, clearly in hindsight
heralding the sustainable up move that was to come. Since
that time it has acted as consistent downside resistance at most
important market lows, breached on very few intra week occasions.
It just so happens that again in recent weeks the 75 week MA has
again been tested, and at least for now has held. One macro
risk management warning flag lies below the 75 week MA for the
S&P. If we close sustainably below the 75 week MA for
the SPX, we need to start thinking defense.

Certainly
this is but one of many risk management tools in the greater
analytical tool box, as is margin debt analysis. As we look
ahead into the new year, one big question for investors is whether
the equity markets will undergo meaningful trend change given the
ongoing difficulty in credit markets and clear and present speed
bumps facing US consumers. The answer to the question of
market trend will ultimately be found in corroboration of
directional message among many risk management indicators.
Our
very best wishes to you and your families for a wonderful holiday
season ahead.
|