|
September 2002
Unfinished
Business
Consumption Junction?...Although
the recent official headline recession is over for now, current
labor market conditions resemble anything but a strong economic
recovery. Important in that households have stretched
financially over the last few years to continue spending. In
good part responding to stimulus such as low mortgage rates and
zero percent auto financing. But for how much longer can
consumer spending hold up as labor market conditions remain stuck
in limbo, not getter a whole lot worse, but certainly not
improving meaningfully at the margin? Although we have begun
to deflate the bubble in the equity markets, the bubble of
systemic leverage expansion has barely been addressed.
Households have continued to lever as if there has been no
downturn at all. As we approach the anniversary of zero
percent auto financing schemes and current mortgage rates bounce
near multi decade lows, for how much longer will anomalistic
financial incentives support consumer spending via further
leveraging of personal balance sheets as labor markets now
approach conclusion of their second year of historically relevant
weakness? Certainly the answers to these questions lie ahead
and will have direct bearing on the economy as a whole, but
anecdotes are beginning to mount that suggest change in
consumption patterns at the margin are beginning to emerge.
There was asset price
"cheering" on Wall Street with the release of the recent
unemployment report. The headline revealed that the
unemployment rate dropped from 5.9% in July to 5.7% in August. But
as usual, a peek behind the headline reveals a bit less to cheer
about. It just so happens that on a net basis, private
sector (non-governmental) job creation was actually
negative. It's the first time this has happened since April
of this year. The headline employment number read an
increase of 39,000 gainfully employed bodies for the month, but
the increase in government workers was 41,000. And of the
government body count increase, close to one half were airport
security workers. Suffice it to say that the report was
actually nothing to cheer about in terms of the private sector. It's not just the
employment report where tepid labor conditions are
characterized. Broad economic statistics are littered with
anecdotal evidence. Jobless claims data is clearly starting
to resemble the jobless recovery period of the early 1990's:

The help wanted index at the
moment rests at a low not seen since August of 1964.
Corroborating jobless claims trends is the fact that the help
wanted reading has been meandering in the mid 40's area since last
October. Most post recessionary experiences past witnessed a
"V" shaped recovery in this reading. The only two
periods of the last four decades to experience lingering weakness
in help wanted readings was the early 1990's and now:

The Institute of Supply
Management (the ISM - formerly the National Association of
Purchasing Managers) index for both the manufacturing and
non-manufacturing sectors of the economy has continually
suggested a malaise in labor conditions over the past few
years. Just for drill, the ISM readings are what are
called diffusion indices. Academically, a reading above 50
represents expansion and a reading below 50 represents
contraction. Without going into lengthy detail, we consider
anything above 48 expansion. This is what employment
conditions have looked like in both of these readings over the
recent past:


Although employment conditions
have improved on a relative basis compared with post 9/11
experience, modest contraction remains the characterization of the
moment.
Lastly, the recent Challenger,
Gray and Christmas layoff count spiked anew this month with the
current reading standing well above any experience of the 1990's.

We're not suggesting that the
world is about to come to an end for labor markets, but rather
that these markets are stuck in limbo for now. Stuck in a
netherworld of neither significant deterioration nor
recuperation. Perhaps the most ironic implication for the
financial markets over the near term is that these tepid
statistics just may not give the Fed enough justification to ease
interest rates near term. Despite an equity market that may
be terribly desirous of such a perceptual event. In like
manner, labor markets have remained difficult for a long enough
period that consumers may be set to change their forward spending
habits at the margin.
As we will cover ahead in this
discussion, equity mutual fund holders continued to
"consume" equity mutual funds well after the top in the major equity
indices had already been seen. In denial that a severe downturn in equity prices
could be a possibility, let alone a strong probability. It
has been only recently that the face of equity mutual fund
consumption appears to be changing in a meaningful fashion. In the face of clearly
tepid labor market conditions at best over the last few years and now a relapse in macro economic
weakness, American households have continued to lever and spend as if a significant
economic recovery were right around the corner. Are we set
to move from the denial to the realization phase of the consumer
spending cycle ahead much as appears to have happened with equity
fund participants?
Retails From The Crypt...Despite
the apparent economic recovery starting late last year, the
complexion of retail sales have started to change a bit. Ex
the volatile auto and gasoline components of the report, retails
sales year to date have been nothing to write home about:

There is no question that autos
and housing have really carried the ball in terms of being key
economic supports over the past few years. But time is
running out on each in terms of acceleration in per unit growth
rates. Any semblance of pent up demand in both sectors has
surely been satiated in large part over the last few years.
As we move forward, financing incentives will have a diminishing
impact on growth rates. Very possibly, consumers will again
begin to accelerate spending in the non auto and housing portion
of the total retail sector, but recent evidence suggests something
to the contrary. Significant sales and earnings
disappointments have recently been seen at such key retailers as Best Buy,
Circuit City, and Radio Shack. Just this week, Wal-Mart
announced that recent sales are falling below plan. Home
Depot made their recent quarterly numbers purely on the back of
cost cutting as declining S,G&A offset 4.2% same store sales
declines. And something else very interesting appears to be
happening with very little mainstream notice.
In the following chart, we
simplistically present the historical growth rate in personal consumption
expenditures less the growth rate in average hourly
earnings. Have a look:

Again, on a very simplistic
basis, what you are looking at is the matching of the growth rate
in personal spending with the growth rate in wages. Very few
times in the last forty years has this relationship dipped this
low. Although historically this relationship contracts in
recessionary periods exactly as one would expect, it also expands
rather violently in emerging economic recoveries. Emergence
as post recessionary pent up demand begins to be felt. For
now, this reemergence is non-existent.
Suffice it to say that there
are anecdotal signs emerging that consumers are beginning to
realize that strong labor market and economic recovery is not
right around the corner. Unsustainable and perhaps dangerous
financial incentives reign the day. We have yet to feel the
eventual backlash of allowing folks to waltz out the front door
with new autos having put zero cash against the purchase.
Ford Motor Credit and GMAC have bought into the concept of the
sustainable consumer credit cycle very late in the game.
Their stock prices have reflected such. The recent real
estate refi boom may yet support another burst of consumer spending
strength ahead, but from a secular interest rate cycle standpoint,
we are certainly approaching one of the last major residential
refi cycles of perhaps the next decade or longer. The two
decade bull market in the ability to near continuously refinance
many forms of debt is drawing to a dramatic
close. Have we reached the point where in the absence of
relatively extraordinary and unsustainable credit stimulus, the
economy is flat at best? Are we approaching the point
when consumer America addresses the fact
that the labor markets are not turning around in earnest as their spending habits continue as if
recovery has already happened? The evidence is
mounting. Evidence critically important in light of the
following historical relationship of personal consumption
expenditures to GDP:

Unfinished Business?...Certainly
we are witnessing bubble deflation in the equity markets.
After one of the most incredible equity bull markets in our
financial history, set against the backdrop of possibly the
greatest credit boom this country has ever seen, a period of
significant reconciliation is only to be expected. Where are
we in the process? In terms of the equity markets, it's
really anyone's guess. Aggregate valuations have compressed,
but the bubble that still remains completely unreconciled at the
moment is that of systemic leverage. In our minds, the two
are inextricably linked, as is the influence of this combined
reconciliation on the real economy.
Let's be realistic, measuring
the aggregate markets or specific indices such as the S&P 500
based on earnings is fraught with risk. Yes, there are many
companies with no earnings that can skew the current numbers
higher. Yes, earnings are depressed during this time of
economic softness. Academically, although the argument that one
should expect relatively high earnings multiples during an
earnings trough is intuitively appealing, we are going to need to
see significant earnings expansion ahead to justify current
earnings based valuations.
Nothing says that we have to
return to the depths seen in the 1970's and early 1980's for
equities to be considered attractive, but as you know, we are
currently nowhere even near the average of valuation ratios over the
last half century (red dotted line) at least. The wings of Icarus
have begun to melt in the hot sun, but the taste of salt water
lies far below. What remains to be reconciled
ahead may just be the very mathematical nature of historical
equity returns versus current expectations. We have
witnessed many an institutional pension plan sponsor significantly reweight portfolios
over the last few months in favor of increasing equities and
decreasing bond exposure. A reweighting based on the
assumption that equities have provided superior historical returns
relative to fixed income products. An assumption that future
returns will resemble past experience. The potential
significant mistake in this set of assumptions being that
dividends have historically played a very meaningful role as a
component of total equity return. Dividends that today are
near the lowest levels ever witnessed. Implicitly, to earn
what has been the average annual return for stocks over the last
century in the years ahead, price will need to play a much more
significant role than will dividends as the current price to
dividends ratio clearly reflects. Is this really realistic?
There is no question that the equity bubble is surely in the process of
reconciliation. But, ultimate bottoms are a guessing game at
best. We can look back at periods such as the early 1960's
where inflation and interest rates levels were quite similar to
what we experience at the present. The market bottomed at
valuation levels much higher than was seen in the 1970's or
1980's bear bottoming episodes. But what clearly stands out
to us as a key differential in our present circumstance relative
to almost any other period of the last century is leverage.
For now, it is the bubble that has kept right on expanding as the
equity valuation bubble has begun to contract. It is the
bubble that may ultimately have a much more direct impact on
the real economy if this period of domestic economic malaise is
prolonged in nature. It just may be the most important
unfinished business relative to this in process equity bear
market.
For now, we will leave you with
just a few glimpses of historical context. These charts are
as of 1Q 2002. We expect new Fed data within a week or so to
update through 2Q. The following charts do not suggest that
the world is about to come to an end, but rather that we exit the
current recessionary period with the smallest aggregate degree of financial flexibility this country has seen in 50 years at
least. The following are financial weights shackled to our
ankles. Preventing us from an economic sprint so
characteristic of emerging economic recoveries during the post war
era to date.

Virtually completely
uncharacteristic of recessions past, consumer credit has rocketed
skyward throughout the official recession and beyond. As you
know, there may be no interest on the car loan, but no one said
anything about the significant principal repayment bill being a
piece of cake:

Academically, we must remember
that the household ownership rate in the US at present is pushing
near 70%. A record number. Having said that, growth in
mortgage debt has certainly outstripped the growth in
homeownership rates over this period.

There is no law that suggests
financial bubbles must be reconciled in simultaneous
fashion. During the latter 1990's, Fed induced liquidity was
sufficient to support both equity market valuations and the real
economy vis-à-vis credit expansion. For now, that is no
longer true for the equity markets. Although it still may be
true in part for the real economy, systemic leverage expansion is
"buying" lesser and lesser amounts of GDP growth as we
move forward. Anecdotes of the law of diminishing returns
lie at our feet. There is unfinished business in bubble
reconciliation for this cycle.
Flow Motion...By now,
it's certainly common knowledge that we saw the largest single
month for equity mutual fund redemptions in the history of the US
financial markets during July. A bit of a
milestone. The official ICI (Investment Company Institute)
compendium put the outflow at $49 billion in July. But what
was perhaps the most interesting aspect of these recent numbers is
the fact that it is estimated that equity mutual fund managers
only sold $36 billion of equities in July as cash as a percentage
of equity mutual fund assets dropped to 4.3%:

As you can see, as of July
month end, cash in equity mutual fund rests near a three decade
low. Nowhere even near the levels of cash seen at sustainable
secular equity lows. As you know, in the modern investment
era, many a fund family has either an actual or unofficial mandate
to remain near fully invested at all times. But is this
really serving the best interests of their broad fund
clientele? Or just serving the consultant driven
institutional marketing purposes of these institutions? No
matter what the rationale, cash in equity funds is low.
Dangerously low relative to the potential for further
redemptions. Suffice it to say that if we encounter
significant further redemptions from here, it is going to be met
with selling, plain and simple. For all intents and
purposes, there is no more cash with which to pay out potential
redemptions.
|