|
October 2001
The
Accelerant
Backdraft...In our
September discussion, we questioned whether the US consumer would
be able to continue along the consumption path in support of the
economy in relatively undeterred fashion ahead. Little did
we know at the time that the horrifically tragic events of
September 11 would be right around the corner. We have seen
many a pundit point to the World Trade Center incident as being
the cause for an economic downturn to come. We have
witnessed many a corporate press release anticipate a diminishment
in future results claimed as directly related to the WTC horror. In our
minds, the fallout from the terrorist attacks are not a cause at
all, but rather an economic accelerant in the deceleration that
began at least nine to twelve months ago.
The US consumer has been
witness to deteriorating stock prices for 18 months now. The
2Q 2001 Fed Flow of Funds report released in September records the
ongoing year over year contraction in consumer net worth:
|
US
Consumer Year/Year Net Worth Change |
|
|
2Q
2001 |
2Q
2000 |
Change |
|
|
|
Financial
Assets |
$32,203.6
B |
$
34,842.1 B |
(7.6)
% |
|
Tangible
Assets |
15,889.4 |
14,546.0 |
9.2 |
|
Total
Liabilities |
(7,663.9) |
(7,150.3) |
7.2 |
|
|
|
Net
Worth |
$
40,429.1 |
$
42,237.8 |
(4.3) |
Most assuredly with stock market
action in 3Q, these numbers have gotten a lot worse. In
addition to the psychological effect of the financial markets, weekly unemployment claims and
layoff announcements have been dripping slow but steady black rain
on consumer spirits for the better part of the year.

Certainly, the results of
this tabulation spike higher in the months ahead given the near term
impact of the economic reality seen in the air
travel and related tourism industries. Additionally, the
weight of increased leveraging of consumer balance sheets grown
over years of excess consumption in coincidence with a general
decline in cash savings has been slowing the consumer more rapidly
in recent quarters. The psychological fallout of the WTC
incident accelerates the process downward.
As you know, the WTC tragedy is
an immediate shock to the system. An instantaneous stress
point where there was none but a few days prior. A negative
shock that heightens emotional consumer response to future stock
price movements, economic reports and potential acts of war.
Unlike many exogenous shocks of the past that have jolted the
stability of the US consumer/investor, this event comes at a time
when both macro economic reality and the general perception of that
reality are already fragile. Making it especially difficult
for the domestic consumer to stay on his or her feet. We
only have to look back a little over ten short years ago to
witness the results of the external shock of Iraq invading Kuwait:

Although much of the current
consumer confidence report was completed prior to the Sept. 11
destruction, it seems we are now and will continue to be watching
a replay of a consumer confidence reaction to an unanticipated
event that is immediate and sharp. Moreover, the Iraqi
invasion of Kuwait was geographically definable and offered a
specific cast of human characters upon which to focus. The
current circumstances offer no such contextual certainty. As
you can see in the above chart, in each and every recession of the
last 30 years, consumer confidence made a pit stop below the 60
level. At a current 97.6, it's still a long way down from
here. What are the chances of seeing that level or lower
during this cycle? Pretty darn good given that the
accelerant is now in place.
The Comeback Kid?...It's
clearly no secret that corporate capital spending has been in a
recession, if not a modern day depression, for the last twelve
months at least. The WTC tragedy appears to be the
psychological depressant that accelerates an already downward rate
of change environment for the consumer in terms of credit growth
and spending:


Economic statistics released in
the last few weeks that largely cover the period prior to
September 11 have shown renewed downward economic momentum in the
late summer. It's certainly no huge leap of faith to suggest
the numbers get worse ahead. Possibly a whole lot
worse. As the bear market matures, the second act of what so
far must still be characterized as a cyclical phenomenon will be
played out ahead as the consumer buckles. For our money,
economic and financial market analysis now moves on to the
questions of depth and duration. Just how deep will the
current recession become and for how long will it last?
Although unknowable in advance, we would hope that an examination
of current contextual backdrop as well as the anecdotal evidence
of history will allow us to remain rational and objective in
decision making ahead. From a contrarian standpoint, it's
good to see certain negative sentiment mount. But negative
sentiment alone will not mark any kind of financial or economic
bottom. Historical economic signposts of distress will be
important markers ahead. A consumer confidence number below
60, for example, will at least demand thought and potential
reassessment. We'll take it one step at a time.
Set Design... In trying
to make sense of the economic and financial drama that is to
unfold ahead, it's instructive to be aware of the backdrop against
which the story will be told. Protagonists and antagonists
in the cast of players are many. It just so happens that the
Fed Flow of Funds report released a few short weeks ago is nothing
short of a wealth of information regarding the current theatrical
set design. For the corporate and consumer sector, it may
not be the most opportune of times to be facing a domestic and
global economic slowdown. The credit excesses introduced
into the system over the last few decades will definitely be a
hangover from which the corporate and consumer sector will have a
tough time recovering in trying to spark economic growth
ahead. The following are perspectives taken directly from
the numbers found in the Fed report:

Although it can be argued that
interest costs today are lower than in recent cycles of the last
two decades, absolute dollar corporate debt relative to the
benchmark of GDP is as high today as at any time in recent history.
In like manner, relative to
meaningful benchmarks, household debt is well above past
experience:


Finally, financial sector debt
relative to non-financial credit obligations (government,
household and non-financial corporate) is at all time highs.

At the very least, leverage in
the current system suggests that the character of an ultimate
economic recovery may be much more muted than many of the
"V" experiences of the last three or four recessionary
interludes. The stage is set in rather somber tones.
Sugar Keynes...The WTC
incident as being the accelerant applies not only to the near term
acceleration of the economic downturn for this cycle, but also to
what will be accelerated fiscal spending and monetary
accommodation on the part of the government and the central bank
ahead. Clearly the Fed has been fighting the economic
deceleration battle with interest rate policy and open market
operations for nine months now to little or no avail. But it
seems obviously apparent that fiscal spending is set to kick into
high gear. The Keynesian solution, if you will.
We have heard zero talk of
"saving social security" in the last few weeks. We
expect the government to have checkbook open and ready for
spending in the period ahead. And not just for the military
effort. To allow the economy to sink rapidly from here
raises the risk of serious deflation possibilities. Perhaps
the unthinkable. As you know, cold war deficit spending in
this country mushroomed in the 1980's in an effort to vanquish a
global threat that was largely conceptual in nature. There
was no open conflict and no violence on American soil. Just
what do you think the possibilities for deficit spending are when
innocent US lives have been lost and the perception of future risk
has grown substantially?
As a last comment for this
month, what should amount to the deflationary pressure of a
slowing US consumer on both the domestic and global economies will
be met with what seems the only alternative of supercharged fiscal
and monetary policy. It also seems a sure bet that the
global central bank powers that be will also step on the gas
ahead. We believe it's a fair statement that near term
forward GDP will be increasingly dependent on government
spending. The waters between the Scylla and Charybdis of
reflationary and deflationary pressures have grown more murky over
the past month. Although we are not ready to pass judgment
quite yet on the eventual outcome, there is no doubt that the
rocks and whirlpool on either side of the passage are just as
lethal, and navigating the narrow strait has grown more
dangerous. We expect the government to put up one hell of a
fiscal policy fight in trying to support the economy directly
ahead.
What does this mean for
bonds? Although the jury is still out, the following are
perspective:



It is interesting to note that
August recorded a record $16.5 billion net inflow into bond mutual
funds. Are investors arriving late to the bond party?
From a long term perspective it sure appears as much. Unless
the world is truly coming to an end ahead, it sure seems there is
very little to be gained in short maturity Treasury paper outside
of capital preservation and stated coupon. Although this
certainly will not happen overnight, will the WTC incident and its
influence on accelerated monetary and fiscal accommodation sow the
seeds of future inflationary pressures? If nothing else,
it's a question we certainly intend to monitor and address ahead.
|
The
Monthly Market Observations pieces are reflective of the
type of twice weekly discussions available to subscribers
of ContraryInvestor.com. |
|